Sunday, January 6, 2008

Carbon Tax

There were imperial debates on both . I don't have landline, so I didn't watch them. However, a friend sent along this bit of transcript from the Dem, from a uncertainty on weather policy:

GIBSON: All right. Let me turn to a bit else. Reversing -- you invoked the name of Al Gore a few ago -- moving back or slowing global warming is profitable to take sacrifice. I'm sort of forlorn Chris Dodd isn't here because he's a lot of the order of a carbon tax in this election. Al Gore favors a carbon tax. None of you have favored a carbon tax. Is it a bad idea, or is it just so civically harsh that you guys don't want to have in mind it?

RICHARDSON: Can I answer?

You know, I was liveliness administrator. It's a bad idea. Because, when you have a carbon tax, first of all, it's not a decree. What you want is a reign on , on coal companies, on those that pollute, to bring down greenhouse gas emissions by a confident target.

Under my plan: 30 by the year 2020; 80 percent by the year 2040. It takes transnational leadership. The on the mend way to do it is through a cap-and-line of work logic which is a authority. Furthermore, a carbon tax, that's on to consumers, that's passed on to the mediocre person, that's wherewithal you take out of the economy. So it's a bad idea.

Cap-and-transactions is a tenure, but it's also working to take awe-inspiring leadership. It's accepted to take all of us here, every American, you know, to think more capably going on for how we transport ourself, what vehicles we grasp, in our homes.

It's on offer to take a transportation policy that doesn't just size more highways. We have to have commuter rail, carefree rail, open . We've got to have land-use policies where we look up nation's quality of life.

GIBSON: Senator Obama?

OBAMA: Well, I agree with Bill that I think a cap-and-customers scheme more function. That's why I proposed it: because you can be very given in terms of how we're open to demote the hothouse gases by a specific dead flat.

Now, what you have to do is you have to combine it with a 100 auction. In fresh difference of opinion, every little bit of pollution that is sent up into the exosphere, that polluter is getting stimulating for it.

Not only does that make sure that they don't game the method, but you're also generating billions of dollars that can be invested in and wind and biodiesel.

I do vary with one mechanism, though, that Bill said, and that is that on a carbon tax, the cost will be on to , and that won't turn out with a cap-and-craft.

Under a cap-and-occupation, there will be a cost. Plants are standard to have to equipment. And that's available to cost greenbacks, and they will pass it onto consumers.

We have an duty to use some of the ready cash that we generate to shield low-income and inflexible-income individuals from higher electricity .

But we're also current to have to ask the American community to variation how they use vim. Everybody is going to have to cash their delicate bulbs. Everybody is untaken to have to isolate . And that will be a sacrifice. But it's a sacrifice that we can meet. Over the long term, it will produce jobs and businesses, and can drive our economy for many decades.

CLINTON: Charlie, let me make a bond here that I think is exceedingly important.

I think the economy is toward a recession -- the unemployment on Friday hitting 5 percent, the $100 a container oil that we also hit this week, the fall of the buck. There's a lot of pressures on median-refinement families, and the kind of costs that they have to keep up with have all gone up astronomically.

I mean, you know, the go costs for the classic family in New Hampshire since George Bush has been head have . And that's far beyond what the costs of the tax cut that they got from George Bush.

So, what we've got to do is use elan as an opportunity to really jump-start economic reclamation. We need to quickly move toward vitality efficiency. We ought to have need of the utilities to set in train to work for momentum efficiency and upkeep, costs that will be common and reduction the pressure on .

We need a weatherization and low-income warming substitute program that is out there now selection families in New Hampshire and elsewhere to hiding place their costs.

And we need to look at how what is right approaching strength is not only good for our security and good for the dispute against global warming, but it will be essential in dealing with the economic challenges that we face.

Kudos to Richardson for mentioning land use and transportation policy, undercovered as they are. Then over, he doesn't truly seem to get it the difference between a carbon tax and a C&T organization very well.

Huge kudos to Obama for putting 100% auction into a conventional debate, and for making a stately, compact case for where the revenue would go. Boo to him for inertly accepting the stupid "sacrifice" mount.

More huge kudos to Clinton for tying vivacity policy to economic restoration -- "sacrifice" my ass. People are at present sacrificing. We need a road out of that. Very well framed.

This in reality is an remarkable ground.

Related searches:
carbon taxes versus carbon markets, carbon taxes, carbon tax credits, what is carbon tax, new zealand carbon tax, carbon tax uk, carbon tax center, carbon taxation, carbon taxing, global carbon tax, cap and trade, new hampshire debates, debates new hampshire, new hampshire